Hey,that's similar to the WC14 away one!

Red shirt,"unique neckline" (nothing that unusual,can't exactly remember it),dark red cross either slap bang on the centre or behind the badge.That's what I remember... Some details might be wrong.

It looks great - except for the monotone crest, the standard colour one would have sufficed.

That would have made this into a great shirt.

@Spider The reason I used a "monotone" crest, as you describe it, here is because I didn't use any elements of blue anywhere in the entire kit, I wanted to make the kit simply red and white, just like the St. George's cross therefore I removed the blue from the crest as any competent designer would have done in this situation... The resolution probably isn't high enough for you to see but the roses remain red and being a lighter shade of red than the shirt, up close they would be noticeable... no meaning lost, overall look enhanced.

Blue is one of the colours that has been on every England shirt untill the 2012 home, and as a proud Englishman, the shirt just does not look right without a crest that has blue on it. The lions were blue right from Englands first international until 2012, so the blue should really have stayed. The rest of the kit is really nice though.

Have to agree with spider, this kit would actually look better with the (royal, not navy) blue england badge, I'm not dead against the one colour badges generally but in this instance I am.

I think this looks very modern and sharp; wouldn't look that great with a full color standard badge. In certain instances it makes the kit look cheap and dated.

I think a full color badge is only needed if the kits design elements can't carry the shirt alone. This cross can, however.