I disagree massively with Steevo here. The reintroduction of the white is perfectly handled, in my opinion, especially incorporating yellow and white into the crest. Well done removing the "Warrior" wording from their logo too. Completely unnecessary and looks much better for it being gone.
In my opinion the kit would look better and be better balanced if the LFC badge and the warrior badge were both the same colour but if you're going to have one of the badges in gold and one white it would be better that the LFC badge was gold, wouldn't it?
I'm not saying the sponsor should be gold though. The way it is now is very good.
See, I think of Liverpool kits has having a white Liver Bird, like the late 80s ones onward. I know people say that the definitive look is with a gold/yellow crest but I'm not that way inclined.
I think the socks look particularly good too, especially with the white Liver Bird.
Good points, I'm undecided, the Warrior is the same colour as the gold flashes so not significant, whereas I think the Liverbird stands out in brilliant white. That said, next to the Liverbird I suppose the Warrior has emphasis, so I could be swayed to change it.